How bad was the science underneath the consensus in anthropogenic global warming research? Very bad apparently that scientists at the Climatic Research Unit had to skirt around Freedom of Information requests for CRU data and attempted to destroy (and may already have) data that revealed the inconvenient truth on agw.
From geocentric universe to humancentric global warming, "scientific consensus" has given way to science under the bright light of skepticism. Now, the Wall Street Journal has a good summary of the global warming hoax that was exposed last week.
CRU is the Pentagon of agw research, housing the largest dataset of recorded global temperatures. Why their scientists had to hide their data and burn the Copernicuses in their midst cast a serious doubt whether what is really underneath the consensus isn't science but a new gaia-based religion.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment